How It Started
For the first two meetings, I excitedly signed into Zoom ready to meet with this newly minted council. This diverse group consisted of real estate pros with professional-level experience in and passion for justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (J.E.D.I.) work. Yes!, I secretly cheered to myself because it felt like a new day was indeed dawning.
During the initial meetings, I noticed that psychological safety was lacking due to the tone and power over stance that was taken by some. Conventional wisdom affirms that with a team of volunteers, you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar as my fellow Southerners will coo. Thus, expressing power with in an emotionally intelligent way is critical to maintaining the momentum volunteers crave and thrive from when engaged.
Which of our key terms was lacking or out of order?
Being the type of person I am, I spoke up outside of the meeting to not add any further injury to the group's enthusiasm. I was heard by the association's staff and the council chair. Yes! A good faith showing that the quest for belonging and expressing ourselves (inclusion) and fairness (equity) was likely legit.
How It's Going
Cue horror movie music.
This month, at the start of Black History Month (which for me meant my hopes were soaring high), the council met again. This time the meeting had more than those that had self-proclaimed a commitment to J.E.D.I. work. This time the meeting included representatives (mostly the vice-chairs, mostly men, and mostly white) from other committees, that did not explicitly share nor deny their enthusiasm with J.E.D.I. efforts. Rather, they shared their attendance was a new responsibility to sit in on this council.
It is important to note here that J.E.D.I. work is most effective -- creating the desired, productive climate -- when it is compelling, not mandatory. I am sure you can likely relate. How do you feel and what are the results when you want to do something versus when you are being told to do it (voluntold is what we call it in the non-profit sector)? The latter scenario usually does not go as well as the former. Cue horror movie music getting louder.
During this Zoom video meeting, genuine concerns were raised surrounding how the association would implement J.E.D.I. initiatives. For example, a point was raised on how saying a Christian prayer at the start of meetings excludes those of other faiths.
After about 30 - 40 minutes of dialogue, one of the new attendees interjected.
How do we know that this is even an issue? expressed
the white male regarding diversity and inclusion. Of the other new attendees present, there were several head nods and
mmm-hmmms that I noticed.
Did you notice the metacommunication? Which of our key terms was lacking or out of order? Let's pause for the cause. Have you ever poured your heart out and shared an experience that either happened to you or someone you know only to have the person that you thought was listening say, Huh? What did you say? How did that make you feel?
That feeling describes how this meeting at that moment felt to me. It would have been one thing to inquire about the state of the association at the start of our group discussion before anyone had shared their experiences. But to hear the concerns of differing religions, races, genders, and sexual orientations for 30 - 40 minutes and then ask if there is even a problem, undermines our earlier definitions of a growth mindset, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Here is how this metacommunication can be narrated:
This new attendee’s question -- even if unintentionally -- ignored and erased each of the voices that just spoke for 30 - 40 minutes, rendering them invisible.
This new attendee's question revealed he was (is) having a different experience than others and was unable to empathetically step into their shoes after 30 - 40 minutes of dialogue.
This new attendee's question felt dismissive to both the experiences and needs of the council members and the members within this local association for whom the council members were speaking on behalf for 30 - 40 minutes.
This new attendee's question ultimately revealed a life of not having to consciously navigate all of the aforementioned challenges; and, thereby, not having to live a life consumed with their implications or finding methods to mitigate them like those that spoke for 30 - 40 minutes.
All-in-all, this new attendee’s question embodied a living, breathing, real-time example of why this particular local association is not yet (it still can be) a beacon of belonging and why robust J.E.D.I. work is essential.
To add fuel to this inferno, this association had previously conducted membership focus groups, surveying those that did not feel a sense of belonging among this local association. This information is also available, making such a question -- again, with anecdotes AND research data accessible -- feel like a slap in the face of diversity and inclusion, which this council was designed to champion -- it is literally in the name.
Conversely, how can our association leadership (and perhaps in your case, your realty firm) begin to be J.E.D.I. meta-communicators?
Growing in diversity and inclusion means that you learn to listen to what people have to say, that are different from you, with the filter, ‘They are speaking from an experience and perspective that is not my own.’ --Terence Lester, Diversity Scholar and Minister
In spite of all of that, as a trained J.E.D.I. worker, I wanted to tap into my empathy muscles for the new attendees: I understand how if you are currently happily in love, you don't quite get what's going on with those that are not experiencing the same degree of euphoric amore. So I bit the bait. I spoke up and, due to a lack of time, shared just one diminishing and exclusionary experience that I personally had as a Black person and as a woman during one of my times as a committee chair within this particular association. This was at the end of the meeting. I received a few direct messages in the Zoom chat from the original members thanking me for being vulnerable. Then, it was time to hop off. I felt heard but perhaps not empathetically understood based on the number of furrowed brows of some of the new attendees.
Two days later, I heard from the council's chair, a Black woman that had been award by this association just weeks before the Five Star Circle of Service Award (one of its highest honors to bestow). She shared that she had decided to step down (cue the revolving door). What? Why? I cried out as if the knife in the horror movie had been plunged into my unsuspecting and naive back.
To sum it up, she tells me that the new attendees (specifically the one that questioned if a lack of diversity and inclusion are even problems) reported the meeting. From there, the association conveyed to the chairwoman that these meetings were really just to execute the pre-set agenda already decided upon by the board of directors. In essence, this attempt at a discreet rebuke amounted to sit still and make us look pretty.
Which of our key terms was lacking or out of order?
I exhaled deeply while sadness enveloped me, hearing and acknowledging these words. Is this really happening? Is this council just for show? Why do they have us wasting our time IN A PANDEMIC if they don't really want our input? I pondered.
Cue the crescendo of the horror music.
'It Was All a Dream, I Used to Read Word Up! Magazine'
One of the written, association-approved tenets of this council is: to continually review the Association for systemic racism and discrimination issues that hold back, and/or discourage diverse leadership and membership. That is the stated intent but the actual impact is far from this, particularly when this very council's input was being discouraged.
Well, how does this review properly happen if the council is told, in so many words, to just do as you're told and to be seen not heard? (Sorry if those statements trigger any of your inner child wounds.) You probably know the answer to that -- it does not happen. Instead, the status quo continues. This is fake inclusion a.k.a. tokenism.
On its face, the association can say, Look at us. We are so committed to diversity and inclusion that we have a council so named. But if you whip out a magnifying glass, it is glaringly obvious that this diversity and inclusion council as it stands today is in name only -- the real discussions will still be had by only the few in the club that frankly have ignored the depth of marginalized voices, both anecdotally and from research.
...there is a wide chasm separating those organizations doing DEI work and those that are actually valuing the DEI work being done. --Stephanie Creary, Wharton management professor
Continually. Review... Discourage. Diverse. Leadership. Currently, these are just empty words on a webpage.
Diversity invites people to the table, but inclusion empowers your voice to be heard while you're at the table. Diversity without inclusion is shallow marketing. I do not wish to sit at any tables that want my skin for marketing but not my voice for truth and perspective. --Terence Lester, Diversity Scholar and Minister
I was extremely disappointed. I did not knowingly sign up for and will not placate this game of charades. I am calling it out. Because with J.E.D.I. work, we have to cultivate a culture of intervention and accountability. Gone should be the days to go along just to get along (complicity) when the impact is wrong.
'You Too Can Prevent Forest Fires'
This was my experience with only one local REALTOR® association's perfunctory and performative attempt at diversity and inclusion. Thankfully, I have been privileged to be the J.E.D.I. training and coaching partner with many associations and I know this is not the atmosphere everywhere.